andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-03-28 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
By "new research" you mean "the article is from 2006", right?

Date: 2012-03-28 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com
And, I mean, right below the title, before the article.

(Admittedly, I got halfway through the first sentence before realising I'd read it before and checking the date. And it's not like the research got it's methodology wrong, or isn't the most current and most definitive statement on the matter.)

Date: 2012-03-29 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com
:) I almost don't care: I know perfectly well what the result will be, so I don't feel especially inclined to have lots more studies (although sufficiently many people do have the result in doubt, it's probably worth having at least a couple of big studies to point to).

In fact, on a similar question, I was very interested to realise that some (intellectual) christian friends _did_ have a doubt. I assumed people I knew would say "in theory God could intervene in the world, but you will never ACTUALLY find any double-blind evidence of it", but it turned out not to be that clear-cut.

OTOH, it might be consistent that God responds to some prayers, but only personal ones you really mean, not "Oh, I hope this Angela K I've never met gets better". Obviously I don't believe that, but experimental honesty compells me to admit it ought to have real world effects but be very hard to actually test.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 89 10 1112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 04:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »